One that particularly draws my attention is the work of David Horrell (Horrell, 2005 Solidarity and Difference: A Contemporary Reading of Paul’s Ethics. London: T&T Clark), since Horell utilizes Wendy Doniger's study on Myth in his research (Doniger, 1998 The Implied Spider: Politics and Theology in Myth. New York: Columbia University Press). Horrell, drawing on Doniger, says that myth is "a religious story believed to be true" and has "community-forming" function.
Yet, what does Horrell mean by " true" here? I myself did not check out Doniger's work, but I can definitely say that many myths were not thought to be true in Greco-Roman world, as the works of Cicero and Epicurus, for example, show.
I need to read Doniger's and Horell's works for a fair judgment, though.
No comments:
Post a Comment